Talk:π πΉππΊπ°πΏπ½ππΉπ½
I have a small question. Sometimes Germanologies are used in Gothic, for example, π²πΉπ±π°π½ was used in the past here for 'to be', but this is only used in the German language, so it is changed to π πΉππ°π½. Your articles are good and extensive, but isn't the word order too English? Gothic word order would have been very similar to the old German ones and of the modern Germanic language. Just an advice.
In your article I read: at nahts/ π°π π½π°π·ππ, I think this isn't correct, as 'at' as a prefix for time exists in Gothic, but shouldn't be used in this context. In the dictionary of oe.eclipse.co.uk I read that:
(at a point in SPACE) at +acc.; (at a point in TIME) at +acc. or +dat.; (during the time of) and +acc.; "at sunrise" at urrinnandin sunnin;
As this is about the hours passing by at night, I think the accusative one is the most correct one. And according to the dictionary and should be used with an accusative case. This means that 'nahts' changes in: 'naht'. Otherwise, if it would be dative, 'nahts' would change in 'nahta'. Bokareis (talk) 19:45, 20 π π°ππΌπΌπ΄π½ππΈπ 2014 (UTC)